AI in physics, materials and quantum engineering · 2022–2026

Does This Update Your Priors?

The sceptical position bundles three claims: LLMs don't discover physics; AI won't change the rate of quantum-computer engineering; no LLM-driven system has produced anything physical in materials or physics. Every item below states what was built, who checked it and what the caveat is. Set the filter to your own test and count what survives.

22
items, 2022 – 2026
3
tiers of evidence
4
conditions to apply

The three claims

The filter

Everything

no filter 22 of 22 items survive

Pick a test

Or set the conditions yourself

The strict test, one condition at a time

    Physical-relevance index, by month

    Only items passing the filter are plotted. Not cumulative; quiet months sit at zero.

    Quantum Materials and chips Physics: plasma, weather, fluids, theory Cryptography

      Scored as on the math seismograph, index = 2.5 × P × H × W × C × (1 + log₁₀ n): P physicality 0–10, H horizon (now 1.0, years 0.7, decades 0.4, someday 0.15), W weight 1–4, C confidence 0–1, n = 1 for every item here. The y-axis keeps the unfiltered scale, so tightening the test flattens the trace rather than rescaling it.

      Footnote: the Navier–Stokes claim

      What was claimed

      Caveat